Librarina: Great books for Tweens & Teens

Entries tagged as ‘censorship’

Sandpiper by Ellen Wittlinger

October 25, 2007 · 1 Comment

sandpiper coverI first heard of this book because it was featured on the ASIF! blog. I already knew of, and enjoyed, Ellen Wittlinger’s book Hard Love, so I figured I would give this book a try.

While I understand that some people object to any mention of sex in a book for people under 18, I think that it is a bit crazy to suggest banning a book in which the character realizes that her early entry into sexual relationships was a huge mistake. Sandpiper, who later takes to calling herself Piper, now knows that she made a mistake when she started having casual oral sex, and she wants to figure out a way to get rid of her bad reputation. Who wouldn’t want young people (male or female) to see that this kind of a mistake can cause long-lasting social and emotional damage?

When one of Piper’s “ex-boyfriends” gets angry and starts to threaten Piper, and her family, she doesn’t know what to do. Her mom is about to get remarried and is, therefore, so stressed that Piper doesn’t want to bother her with her own problems. Her father is a womanizer who doesn’t know how to deal with Piper’s newly “developed” physique, and so she doesn’t know how to approach him with this problem either. Her younger sister’s own reputation has been tainted by Piper’s behavior, so she is not exactly sympathetic to Piper’s plight and refuses to believe that the boy in question is really dangerous. Talk about drama! While “real life” may not always be as dramatic as this book, it certainly goes to show that casual sex cannot be simply played off as “no big deal.”

Before I get off my soap box, just let me make one final comment to the teens who are likely to say, “Well, that isn’t what’s gonna happen to me!” … I realize that this exact scenario may not play out for you, but (to paraphrase Piper’s friend Walker): “You’re worth more than that.”

Happy Reading!

Categories: book review
Tagged: , , ,

The Higher Power of Lucky Controversy — A Response

February 18, 2007 · Leave a Comment

thpolWhy is it such a big deal that the word “scrotum” is in a children’s book? Seriously… After all, roughly 50% of children *have* scrotums, right?!?

When I saw the link to the NY Times article — http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/18/books/18newb.html?_r=1&oref=slogin — on Monica Edinger’s blog, Educating Alice — http://medinger.wordpress.com/ — I just shook my head and laughed. People are always so quick to freak out about “indecency” in children’s literature, but I don’t think this fits the bill. Lucky overhears someone talking about a dog whose scrotum was bitten by a rattlesnake. It’s not like the context is at all pornographic. It’s matter of fact, and it is even based on a real-life experience of the author. Refusal to purchase a book because it contains an anatomical word is just, well, a bit silly to me.

Take this quote, for instance: “I think it’s a good case of an author not realizing her audience,” said Frederick Muller, a librarian at Halsted Middle School in Newton, N.J. “If I were a third- or fourth-grade teacher, I wouldn’t want to have to explain that.” Well, third- and fourth-grade students ask a lot of questions, with or without Newbery books to get them going. If you are going to work with kids, you are just going to have to deal with the potential for “embarrassing” questions.

A lot of fourth-grade girls are getting their periods now. If a girl thinks she is bleeding to death (which I once experienced as a substitute teacher), should her teacher not try to explain what is happening to her? Should we tell students that they are not allowed to ask their teachers any questions about the human body or any of its individual parts because it may make teachers uncomfortable? I personally think it would make more sense for teachers to “get over themselves” and just answer with quick, matter-of-fact explanations — “The scrotum is a piece of skin that attaches a boy’s testicles to his body.”

If people could just get used to using the proper words for the human anatomy, instead of acting like the names for our body parts are “swears,” we could avoid ridiculous situations like this. I feel like the sex education teacher in Varsity Blues… “Say it with me everybody: Penis, penis penis. Vagina, vagina, vagina.” Avoiding the anatomical words gives the impression that these words (and therefore body parts) are inherently shameful. I can understand that people do not want children’s book to go into elaborate descriptions of what penises and vaginas look like or what they may be used for — but can’t we all grow up and call things what they are? Or, at the very least, let the braver people use proper names if they so choose?

I’m sure I will probably upset some people by posting this, but I cannot contain my frustration. Censorship is censorship is censorship. Just because some people are uncomfortable reading, hearing, or saying the proper words for “private parts” doesn’t mean that the words are indecent. If you don’t want to read it, that’s fine. But, please don’t tell my child he can’t check it out at your library!

Happy Reading!

Categories: book awards · misc
Tagged: , , , ,

Banned Books Week 2006

September 15, 2006 · Leave a Comment

Read Banned Books: They’re Your Ticket to Freedom. Banned Books Week is September 23-30. Why should you care? Because people have tried getting libraries to ban thousands of books, including Harry Potter, The Giver, How to Eat Fried Worms, and even Where’s Waldo?. Check out the 100 Most Frequently Challenged Books to see if your favorite book is listed.

“Libraries should challenge censorship in the fulfillment of their responsibility to provide information and enlightenment.”—Library Bill of Rights

“We uphold the principles of intellectual freedom and resist all efforts to censor library resources.”—ALA Code of Ethics

For more information about what YOU can do, check out the ALA’s website. And remember… Celebrate your “Freadom” @ your library!

Happy Reading!

Categories: announcement · misc
Tagged: , ,

DOPA

August 3, 2006 · Leave a Comment

If you don’t yet know about the Deleting Online Predators Act, please read this article: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/08/01/scitech/pcanswer/main1853357.shtml. If DOPA is actually passed by the senate, you won’t be allowed to access this blog from a school or public library — and that would just be horrible. Contact your senators — tell them that they need to vote NO!

Happy Reading!

Categories: misc
Tagged: , , , ,